Greg McElwain
Gregory McElwain
Fran Santiago Ávila
Francisco Santiago-Ávila

Human-wolf relations are anything but straightforward as sources of hope for mixed communities. Few species have been subject to wilder human projections than wolves. They have been vilified, cast as the ultimate beast and the mythical opposite of humans, something quite aptly described by Midgley in her “The Concept of Beastliness”-paper (1973). At the same time, wolves have been romanticized, idealized as symbols of a pristine nature better off without humans. Wolves have been hunted to extinction, only to be reintroduced as champions of rewilding. Now, as the pendulum swings once more, they face renewed threats of expulsion from the mixed communities.

The National Wolf Conversation describes itself as an “unprecedented effort to convene people across the nation to engage around the longstanding conflict about wolves in the lower 48. Spanning three years, the conversation aims to give voice to all perspectives, build understanding, and determine a shared path forward.” It is an interesting application of peacemaking practices developed in the human context to human-animal-relations. This time, wolves are neither just “problems” nor “protégés”, but agents in their own right, entitled to be represented as stakeholders. For this team, the goal is to exchange general expertise and specific experiences with this experiment, fostering dialogue not just among themselves but also with students and the wider community.

Wolves

Wolves